Comparisons
How ClawMail compares to traditional email APIs and temporary email services
Comparisons
Understanding when to use ClawMail versus other email solutions.
ClawMail vs Traditional Email APIs
Services like SendGrid, Mailgun, and Postmark focus on sending transactional emails at scale. They're excellent for newsletters, marketing campaigns, and high-volume notifications.
| Feature | ClawMail | Traditional APIs |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Agent mailboxes | Email sending |
| Receiving Emails | Full inbox per agent | Webhooks/parsing |
| Email Address | Dedicated per agent | Shared domain |
| Inbox Management | Built-in folders, read status | Not available |
| Target Use Case | AI agents, automations | Marketing, transactional |
| Send Volume | 25/day per agent | Thousands/day |
| Storage | 50MB per agent | No storage |
Choose Traditional APIs when:
- You need to send thousands of emails per day
- You don't need to receive emails
- You need advanced deliverability features
- You're building marketing email campaigns
Choose ClawMail when:
- Each agent/service needs its own email address
- You need to receive and process incoming emails
- You want inbox management (folders, read status)
- You're building AI agents or automations
ClawMail vs Temporary Email Services
Temporary email services like Guerrilla Mail or TempMail provide disposable addresses for one-time use. They're designed for privacy and avoiding spam.
| Feature | ClawMail | Temp Email Services |
|---|---|---|
| Persistence | Permanent agents | Temporary/expiring |
| API Access | Full REST API | Limited or none |
| Authentication | API key per agent | None |
| Send Capability | Yes | No |
| Programmatic Control | Full CRUD operations | Read-only |
| Use Case | Production systems | Testing, privacy |
Choose Temporary Email when:
- You need a one-time throwaway address
- You're testing email flows manually
- Privacy is the main concern
Choose ClawMail when:
- You need programmatic API access
- You need to send emails, not just receive
- You're building production applications
- You need persistent, reliable addresses
ClawMail vs Self-Hosted Email
Running your own email server (Postfix, Dovecot, etc.) gives you complete control but requires significant operational overhead.
| Feature | ClawMail | Self-Hosted |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | Minutes | Days/weeks |
| Maintenance | None | Ongoing |
| Deliverability | Handled (via Resend) | Your responsibility |
| Spam Filtering | Basic | Your responsibility |
| Cost | Pay per use | Server costs |
| Customization | Limited | Complete control |
Choose Self-Hosted when:
- You need complete control over the email stack
- You have strict compliance requirements
- You have email operations expertise
Choose ClawMail when:
- You want to focus on your application, not email infrastructure
- You need a quick, reliable solution
- You don't want to manage email servers
When to Use ClawMail
ClawMail is the right choice when:
-
AI Agents Need Email - Your AI assistant, chatbot, or automation needs its own email address to communicate with users or other services.
-
Multi-tenant Email - You're building a platform where each user, team, or service needs a dedicated email address.
-
Email-triggered Workflows - You want to trigger automations based on incoming emails (support tickets, order notifications, etc.).
-
Simple Email Operations - You need basic send/receive without the complexity of enterprise email systems.
-
Prototype & MVP - You're building a proof-of-concept and need email functionality quickly.
Feature Summary
| Capability | ClawMail |
|---|---|
| Receive emails | ✅ |
| Send emails | ✅ |
| Inbox folders | ✅ |
| Read/unread status | ✅ |
| Delete & trash | ✅ |
| API authentication | ✅ |
| TypeScript SDK | ✅ |
| HTML email support | ✅ |
| Multiple recipients | ✅ |
| Bulk send | ✅ |
| Reply to emails | ✅ |
| Agent metadata | ✅ |
| Rate limiting | ✅ |
| Serverless deployment | ✅ |